The identity of ESPN is becoming more and more political. The only problem? They are not good at political commentary.
Bill Simmons was once ESPN’s hottest talent, but now, backed by HBO and Vex Media, he’s running his own media empire with The Ringer, various social platform enhancements, and an accompanying podcast smorgasbord. Jemele Hill rose to the ESPN rankings and became one of the most famous faces, especially at 6:00 pm. Sports Center with co-host Michael Smith. Dan Leader, who also works for ESPN, owns the airwaves in (figuratively) South Florida, and his sports and culture resonate online and on television.
Countless other ESPN and former ESPN personalities share their thoughts,
Observations and analysis with millions of fans every day. They “keep sports way behind them,” especially given President Trump’s tweet trend and inability to move away from false social and sports commentary. Not only do they refuse to “stick to sports”, but they also talk about how to stop “sticking to sports”. As Simmons recently stated,
My boss has always been obsessed with ESPN’s commitment to sports. They wanted ESPN to be a sanctuary from the real world. We don’t care what you believe, how you vote, or where you live. We do not condemn you. It’s safe here. Tell us about 해외스포츠중계. For the writers, speakers, and talking heads of ESPN, politics has been our invisible third pillar. There was no nuance. They wanted as many sports fans as possible to watch ESPN. Even when they bought FiveThirtyEight, they showed it – this is an analytical site, not a political one.
And so it went on for 35 years. When John Skipper puts a lot of emphasis on diversity
, the sport collides with everything else, first finding and promoting talent that doesn’t look like me or Scott Vampire, and then funding the Undefeated. Stick to sports. This became impossible when Donald Trump won the election and Colin Kaepernick began to kneel in protest during the national anthem. It really became impossible when President Trump began to divide Americans in an increasingly horrifying way. And when Trump recently declared war on the NFL, it became unthinkable. ESPN cannot ignore race and politics because NO ONE can ignore race and politics. Especially when the president played his own version of the dog whistle.
It’s understandable why Simmons, Hill,
Rubboard and others think it’s impossible to play sports when the President of the United States tweets about the firing of an NFL player. Given Simmons’ immersion in popular culture, its understandable why Simmons, who parks in front of multiple TVs on Sundays the 20th of the year and watches 12-hour football, is retiring from the sport. It’s almost inevitable because sometimes you have to get away from the sport. It is understandable why Le Batard is ashamed of the audience for raising and complaining about all sorts of political or social issues. This is a free radio show that you can turn off if you don’t like it. I can understand why Jemele Hill tweeted this.
Do you understand how a person who opposes the president (most Americans) and has many supporters (perhaps all of the above) can refuse to speak out?
This, of course, is understandable, but people should not like this, even those who did not vote for Trump. It’s understandable what these sports personalities want to say, but that doesn’t mean those who refuse to spend their time listening to sports personalities’ political comments are wrong. A similar phenomenon can be seen on night television. Is Jimmy Kimmel the Walter Cronkite of our time? Please. So why don’t you hear someone focus on the complex political and social issues of sports and show business figures?
There are several possible reasons.
Expertise. The sheer amount of time it takes to become an expert at anything in today’s complex and professional society is an obstacle to insightful commentary in many disciplines. On Sunday, Simmons sits for hours staring at several TV screens, thinking about everything from the Vegas line to the quarterback game to Roger Goodell’s property politics. In a podcast, Zach Lowe laments the non-stop nature of today’s NBA, and in a column he provides detailed evidence to back up his analysis of a life spent parsing figures and movies. As Malcolm Gladwell showed, it takes time to become an expert at something. Sportscasters who are good at analyzing and discussing sports usually don’t have the time or attention to become a skilled political analyst. As a result, political analyzes of sports broadcasters are often superficial, biased and unfounded. It also clearly remains
The post Why People Want to Be Attached to Sports Attachment appeared first on VOICENDO.
Brainwave Canal
No comments:
Post a Comment